Main Entry - Personal Name
Title Statement The devil behind the surplice : Matthias Flacius and John Hooper on adiaphora
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint) Pickwick Publications, Eugene, OR : [2018]
©2018
Physical Description
Bibliography, etc. Note Includes bibliographical references (pages 171-178) and index.
Formatted Contents Note Part I. Matthias Flaciuis and the Adiaphoristic Controversy : -- 1. The path to the adiaphoristic controversy -- 2. Flacius' case against the Interims -- 3. Concluding thoughts on Part One -- Part II. John Hooper and the Vestment Controversy : -- 4. The path to the vestment controversy -- 5. Hooper's case against the vestments -- 6. Conclusion: comparisons and contrasts.
Summary, etc Between 1548 and 1551, controversies over adiaphora, or indifferent matters, erupted in both Germany and England. Matthias Flacius Illyricus in Germany and John Hooper in England both refused to accept, among other things, the same liturgical vestment: the surplice. While Flacius' objections to the imperial liturgical requirements were largely contextual, because the vestments and rites were forced on the church and were part of a recatholicizing agenda, Hooper protested because he was convinced that disputed vestments and rites lacked a biblical basis. The Devil behind the Surplice demonstrates that, while Flacius fought to protect the reformation principle of justification by grace alone through faith alone, Hooper strove to defend the reformation principle that Scripture alone was the source and norm of Christian doctrine and practice. Ultimately, Flacius wanted more Elijahs, prophets to guide a faithful remnant, and Hooper wanted a new Josiah, a young reform king to purify the kingdom and strip it of idolatry.
Subject - Personal Name Flacius Illyricus, Matthias, Hooper, John, Flacius Illyricus, Matthias, 1520-1575. Hooper, John, -1555. Flacius Illyricus, Matthias, Hooper, John,
Subject - Topical Term
Subject - Geographic Name
Index Term - Genre/Form
ISBN 9781532617720 (pbk.) 1532617720 (pbk.)
*00003313cam a22005057i 4500
*00124852
*00520180914084549.0
*008180816t20182018oru b 001 0 eng d
*010 $a2017278239
*020 $a9781532617720 (pbk.)
*020 $a1532617720 (pbk.)
*035 $a(OCoLC)ocn996975951
*040 $aBTCTA$beng$cBTCTA$dWIO$dOCLCF$dPTS$dCNKUC$dLNT$dDLC
*042 $alccopycat
*05000$aBR305.3$b.J64 2018
*1001 $aJohnston, Wade,$d1977-,$eauthor
*24514$aThe devil behind the surplice :$bMatthias Flacius and John Hooper on adiaphora /$cWade Johnston.
*264 1$aEugene, OR :$bPickwick Publications,$c[2018]
*264 4$c©2018
*300 $axviii, 180 pages ;$c23 cm
*336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
*337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
*338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
*504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 171-178) and index.
*5050 $aPart I. Matthias Flaciuis and the Adiaphoristic Controversy : -- 1. The path to the adiaphoristic controversy -- 2. Flacius' case against the Interims -- 3. Concluding thoughts on Part One -- Part II. John Hooper and the Vestment Controversy : -- 4. The path to the vestment controversy -- 5. Hooper's case against the vestments -- 6. Conclusion: comparisons and contrasts.
*520 $aBetween 1548 and 1551, controversies over adiaphora, or indifferent matters, erupted in both Germany and England. Matthias Flacius Illyricus in Germany and John Hooper in England both refused to accept, among other things, the same liturgical vestment: the surplice. While Flacius' objections to the imperial liturgical requirements were largely contextual, because the vestments and rites were forced on the church and were part of a recatholicizing agenda, Hooper protested because he was convinced that disputed vestments and rites lacked a biblical basis. The Devil behind the Surplice demonstrates that, while Flacius fought to protect the reformation principle of justification by grace alone through faith alone, Hooper strove to defend the reformation principle that Scripture alone was the source and norm of Christian doctrine and practice. Ultimately, Flacius wanted more Elijahs, prophets to guide a faithful remnant, and Hooper wanted a new Josiah, a young reform king to purify the kingdom and strip it of idolatry.
*60010$aFlacius Illyricus, Matthias,$d1520-1575.
*60010$aHooper, John,$d-1555.
*60014$aFlacius Illyricus, Matthias, 1520-1575.
*60014$aHooper, John, -1555.
*60017$aFlacius Illyricus, Matthias,$d1520-1575.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00093214
*60017$aHooper, John,$d-1555.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01824538
*650 0$aAdiaphora.
*650 0$aChurch vestments$xHistory.
*650 0$aReformation$zGermany.
*650 0$aReformation$zEngland.
*650 7$aAdiaphora.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00796645
*650 7$aChurch vestments.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00860965
*650 7$aReformation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01092555
*651 7$aEngland.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01219920
*651 7$aGermany.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01210272
*655 7$aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628
*906 $a7$bcbc$ccopycat$d2$encip$f20$gy-gencatlg
*925 $aacquire$b1 shelf copies$xpolicy default
*955 $arn05 2018-08-16 z-processor 1 copy to USASH$irk07 2018-09-14 to BCCD
^
No reviews exists for this book.
Click here
to be the first to write a review.